Digital Communication in the Presence of Noise
Several factors of error in digital receivers are discussed.

When we incorporate additive noise into our channel model, so that rt=α s i t+nt r t α s i t n t , errors can creep in. If the transmitter sent bit 0 using a BPSK signal set, the integrators' outputs in the matched filter receiver would be:

nT(n+1)Trt s 0 td t =αA2T+nT(n+1)Tnt s 0 td t t n 1 T n T r t s 0 t α A 2 T t n 1 T n T n t s 0 t
nT(n+1)Trt s 1 td t =αA2T+nT(n+1)Tnt s 1 td t t n 1 T n T r t s 1 t α A 2 T t n 1 T n T n t s 1 t

It is the quantities containing the noise terms that cause errors in the receiver's decision-making process. Because they involve noise, the values of these integrals are random quantities drawn from some probability distribution that vary erratically from bit interval to bit interval. Because the noise has zero average value and has an equal amount of power in all frequency bands, the values of the integrals will hover about zero. What is important is how much they vary. If the noise is such that its integral term is more negative than αA2T α A 2 T , then the receiver will make an error, deciding that the transmitted zero-valued bit was indeed a one. The probability that this situation occurs depends on three factors:

The function Qx Q x is plotted in semilogarithmic coordinates. Note that it decreases very rapidly for small increases in its arguments. For example, when xx increases from 44 to 55, Qx Q x decreases by a factor of 100100.

The term A2T A 2 T equals the energy expended by the transmitter in sending the bit; we label this term E b E b . We arrive at a concise expression for the probability the matched filter receiver makes a bit-reception error.

p e =Q2α2 E b N 0 p e Q 2 α 2 E b N 0
[link] shows how the receiver's error rate varies with the signal-to-noise ratio α2 E b N 0 α 2 E b N 0 .

The probability that the matched-filter receiver makes an error on any bit transmission is plotted against the signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal. The upper curve shows the performance of the FSK signal set, the lower (and therefore better) one the BPSK signal set.

Derive the probability of error expression for the modulated BPSK signal set, and show that its performance identically equals that of the baseband BPSK signal set.

The noise-free integrator outputs differ by αA2T α A 2 T , the factor of two smaller value than in the baseband case arising because the sinusoidal signals have less energy for the same amplitude. Stated in terms of E b E b , the difference equals 2α E b 2 α E b just as in the baseband case.